The Justice Department Mishandled Barr S Memo On Obstruction Of Trump

A three-judge panel from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the unanimous decision Friday, upholding a lower court ruling last year that ruled the memo should be released. The Justice Department argued that the March 2019 memo — which was sent to Barr by the department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) and another senior department official — was part of DOJ’s internal deliberations before a decision was made about the specialist’s investigation. prosecutor Robert Mueller’s allegations of obstruction. The memo was about whether former President Donald Trump obstructed justice in the Russia investigation. Brandon Bell/Getty Images Therefore, they argued, the document should be exempt from public records requests. But last year U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson called the argument “disingenuous” because the memo was prepared at the same time as a separate Justice Department letter that would have informed Congress and the public that the department had concluded Trump was not obstructing justice. . The appeals court noted Friday that in his letter to Congress, Barr wrote that he decided the investigation did not support an obstruction charge against the president — after consulting with the OLC. He also revealed that while portions of the memo were released, DOJ officials “redacted references to a constitutional bar to prosecuting a sitting President,” meaning the Department failed to initially disclose that the OLC memo had already established that Trump did not could be charged with a crime. while in the office. Meanwhile, the Department said the memo focused on whether Mueller gathered enough evidence to support the allegation that Trump obstructed justice, not on advice for Barr, according to the Associated Press. The appeals court said that if the Department had released the memo directly related to Barr’s decision on the Mueller report, the decision might have been different. “Because the Department did not link the memorandum to the deliberations surrounding the decision, the Department failed to justify its reliance on the deliberative process privilege,” the court wrote. It’s unclear how quickly the memo can be made public, as the DOJ is allowed to appeal Friday’s ruling. The appeals court also noted that their decision was “narrow” and should not be used to challenge previous “precedents that have allowed agencies to withhold drafts of documents related to public messages.”

title: “The Justice Department Mishandled Barr S Memo On Obstruction Of Trump Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-22” author: “Valerie Hollar”

A three-judge panel from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the unanimous decision Friday, upholding a lower court ruling last year that ruled the memo should be released. The Justice Department argued that the March 2019 memo — which was sent to Barr by the department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) and another senior department official — was part of DOJ’s internal deliberations before a decision was made about the specialist’s investigation. prosecutor Robert Mueller’s allegations of obstruction. The memo was about whether former President Donald Trump obstructed justice in the Russia investigation. Brandon Bell/Getty Images Therefore, they argued, the document should be exempt from public records requests. But last year U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson called the argument “disingenuous” because the memo was prepared at the same time as a separate Justice Department letter that would have informed Congress and the public that the department had concluded Trump was not obstructing justice. . The appeals court noted Friday that in his letter to Congress, Barr wrote that he decided the investigation did not support an obstruction charge against the president — after consulting with the OLC. He also revealed that while portions of the memo were released, DOJ officials “redacted references to a constitutional bar to prosecuting a sitting President,” meaning the Department failed to initially disclose that the OLC memo had already established that Trump did not could be charged with a crime. while in the office. Meanwhile, the Department said the memo focused on whether Mueller gathered enough evidence to support the allegation that Trump obstructed justice, not on advice for Barr, according to the Associated Press. The appeals court said that if the Department had released the memo directly related to Barr’s decision on the Mueller report, the decision might have been different. “Because the Department did not link the memorandum to the deliberations surrounding the decision, the Department failed to justify its reliance on the deliberative process privilege,” the court wrote. It’s unclear how quickly the memo can be made public, as the DOJ is allowed to appeal Friday’s ruling. The appeals court also noted that their decision was “narrow” and should not be used to challenge previous “precedents that have allowed agencies to withhold drafts of documents related to public messages.”

title: “The Justice Department Mishandled Barr S Memo On Obstruction Of Trump Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-12-14” author: “Dwayne Rasmussen”

A three-judge panel from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the unanimous decision Friday, upholding a lower court ruling last year that ruled the memo should be released. The Justice Department argued that the March 2019 memo — which was sent to Barr by the department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) and another senior department official — was part of DOJ’s internal deliberations before a decision was made about the specialist’s investigation. prosecutor Robert Mueller’s allegations of obstruction. The memo was about whether former President Donald Trump obstructed justice in the Russia investigation. Brandon Bell/Getty Images Therefore, they argued, the document should be exempt from public records requests. But last year U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson called the argument “disingenuous” because the memo was prepared at the same time as a separate Justice Department letter that would have informed Congress and the public that the department had concluded Trump was not obstructing justice. . The appeals court noted Friday that in his letter to Congress, Barr wrote that he decided the investigation did not support an obstruction charge against the president — after consulting with the OLC. He also revealed that while portions of the memo were released, DOJ officials “redacted references to a constitutional bar to prosecuting a sitting President,” meaning the Department failed to initially disclose that the OLC memo had already established that Trump did not could be charged with a crime. while in the office. Meanwhile, the Department said the memo focused on whether Mueller gathered enough evidence to support the allegation that Trump obstructed justice, not on advice for Barr, according to the Associated Press. The appeals court said that if the Department had released the memo directly related to Barr’s decision on the Mueller report, the decision might have been different. “Because the Department did not link the memorandum to the deliberations surrounding the decision, the Department failed to justify its reliance on the deliberative process privilege,” the court wrote. It’s unclear how quickly the memo can be made public, as the DOJ is allowed to appeal Friday’s ruling. The appeals court also noted that their decision was “narrow” and should not be used to challenge previous “precedents that have allowed agencies to withhold drafts of documents related to public messages.”

title: “The Justice Department Mishandled Barr S Memo On Obstruction Of Trump Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-28” author: “Marie Frazier”

A three-judge panel from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued the unanimous decision Friday, upholding a lower court ruling last year that ruled the memo should be released. The Justice Department argued that the March 2019 memo — which was sent to Barr by the department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) and another senior department official — was part of DOJ’s internal deliberations before a decision was made about the specialist’s investigation. prosecutor Robert Mueller’s allegations of obstruction. The memo was about whether former President Donald Trump obstructed justice in the Russia investigation. Brandon Bell/Getty Images Therefore, they argued, the document should be exempt from public records requests. But last year U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson called the argument “disingenuous” because the memo was prepared at the same time as a separate Justice Department letter that would have informed Congress and the public that the department had concluded Trump was not obstructing justice. . The appeals court noted Friday that in his letter to Congress, Barr wrote that he decided the investigation did not support an obstruction charge against the president — after consulting with the OLC. He also revealed that while portions of the memo were released, DOJ officials “redacted references to a constitutional bar to prosecuting a sitting President,” meaning the Department failed to initially disclose that the OLC memo had already established that Trump did not could be charged with a crime. while in the office. Meanwhile, the Department said the memo focused on whether Mueller gathered enough evidence to support the allegation that Trump obstructed justice, not on advice for Barr, according to the Associated Press. The appeals court said that if the Department had released the memo directly related to Barr’s decision on the Mueller report, the decision might have been different. “Because the Department did not link the memorandum to the deliberations surrounding the decision, the Department failed to justify its reliance on the deliberative process privilege,” the court wrote. It’s unclear how quickly the memo can be made public, as the DOJ is allowed to appeal Friday’s ruling. The appeals court also noted that their decision was “narrow” and should not be used to challenge previous “precedents that have allowed agencies to withhold drafts of documents related to public messages.”