Despite the Justice Department’s objections, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Rinehart said he believed “there are parts of the affidavit that could be unsealed,” referring to the affidavit that contained the evidence on why there was probable cause to investigate the Trump’s mar-a-. Lago Resort. Reinhart ordered the Justice Department to file a redacted version of the affidavit by noon next Thursday, but said the Justice Department would be given an opportunity to appeal if prosecutors do not agree with his proposed version. The judge’s order appeared to mark a victory for the news outlets, which appeared in federal court in West Palm Beach on Thursday to convince the judge that the public interest in the affidavit outweighed the benefits of keeping it sealed. The Department of Justice objects to the release of the evidence. Jay Bratt, head of the department’s counterintelligence and export control division, told the judge Thursday that releasing the affidavit is not in the public interest because it could harm the ongoing investigation. “There is another public interest at stake and that is the public interest in criminal investigations being able to proceed unhindered,” he said. The investigation was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed documents when he left office in January 2021 after losing the presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden. The Justice Department is investigating violations of three laws, including a provision of the Espionage Act that prohibits possession of national defense information and another law that makes it a crime to knowingly destroy, conceal or falsify records to obstruct an investigation. Law enforcement officers stand outside the Paul G. Rogers Federal Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. Despite objections from the Justice Department, a Florida judge said he believes parts of the affidavit used to obtain the warrant that allowed the FBI to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort could be unsealed. (Lynne Sladky/Associated Press)
The media is pushing for the release of records
Lawyers for several media outlets, including the New York Times, the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, ABC News and NBC News, told Reinhart on Thursday that the public’s right to know and the historical significance of the investigation outweighed arguments for keeping of the files. sealed. “The public could not have a more compelling interest in ensuring maximum transparency in this event,” said Charles Tobin, one of the lawyers who supported the media companies. Trump, in statements on social media, asked the court to unseal the unredacted version of the affidavit “in the interest of transparency.” But none of his lawyers have filed motions asking the federal court in West Palm Beach to do so. However, his attorney, Christina Bobb, was present in the courtroom Thursday to watch the proceedings. The former president says the investigation was politically motivated. He also said, without providing evidence, that he had a standing order to declassify the documents in question. However, none of the three laws cited by the Justice Department in the search warrant require proof that the documents were actually classified. Threats against FBI agents have increased since the raid. In Ohio last week, police shot and killed a gunman after he tried to break into an FBI building. A second man in Pennsylvania, meanwhile, has since been charged with making threats against FBI agents.
Witness safety is a concern, Justice Department says
Bratt said Thursday that the two agents named in a leaked copy of the warrant have also received threats since then. In addition, he said, the Justice Department is “very concerned about the safety of the witnesses in the case.” Trump’s rhetoric against the FBI has resonated with Republican voters, 54 percent of whom say federal law enforcement officials acted irresponsibly in the case, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll this week. The Mar-a-Lago investigation marked a major escalation in one of several federal and state probes Trump has faced since his time in office and into private businesses. The Republican former president has suggested he might run for the White House again in 2024, but has made no commitments. WATCHES | Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act:
Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act, FBI search warrant reveals
A US federal judge has unsealed the search warrant used at former US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The Justice Department released a short list of what FBI agents seized, which included 20 boxes of papers that could violate US espionage laws. Last week, US Attorney General Merrick Garland took the highly unusual step of publicly moving to unseal the search warrant, two attachments and a redacted version of the receipt showing the items the FBI seized during its Aug. 8 investigation. The records showed the FBI seized boxes containing 11 sets of classified material, some of which were classified “top secret” – the highest level of classification reserved for the most sensitive US national security information. Such documents are usually kept in special government facilities because disclosure could seriously harm national security. Earlier this week, the Justice Department said it was open to releasing some additional redacted materials from the warrant, such as the covers, the government’s motion to seal and the court’s sealing order. The media in the case requested that those records be unsealed as well. At the start of Thursday’s proceedings, Reinhart said he would unseal those other portions of the documents with some modifications.
title: “Us Judge Says He S Leaning Toward Releasing Some Evidence In Trump Probe Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-12-17” author: “Anna Tanguay”
Despite the Justice Department’s objections, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Rinehart said he believed “there are parts of the affidavit that could be unsealed,” referring to the affidavit that contained the evidence on why there was probable cause to investigate the Trump’s mar-a-. Lago Resort. Reinhart ordered the Justice Department to file a redacted version of the affidavit by noon next Thursday, but said the Justice Department would be given an opportunity to appeal if prosecutors do not agree with his proposed version. The judge’s order appeared to mark a victory for the news outlets, which appeared in federal court in West Palm Beach on Thursday to convince the judge that the public interest in the affidavit outweighed the benefits of keeping it sealed. The Department of Justice objects to the release of the evidence. Jay Bratt, head of the department’s counterintelligence and export control division, told the judge Thursday that releasing the affidavit is not in the public interest because it could harm the ongoing investigation. “There is another public interest at stake and that is the public interest in criminal investigations being able to proceed unhindered,” he said. The investigation was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed documents when he left office in January 2021 after losing the presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden. The Justice Department is investigating violations of three laws, including a provision of the Espionage Act that prohibits possession of national defense information and another law that makes it a crime to knowingly destroy, conceal or falsify records to obstruct an investigation. Law enforcement officers stand outside the Paul G. Rogers Federal Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. Despite objections from the Justice Department, a Florida judge said he believes parts of the affidavit used to obtain the warrant that allowed the FBI to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort could be unsealed. (Lynne Sladky/Associated Press)
The media is pushing for the release of records
Lawyers for several media outlets, including the New York Times, the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, ABC News and NBC News, told Reinhart on Thursday that the public’s right to know and the historical significance of the investigation outweighed arguments for keeping of the files. sealed. “The public could not have a more compelling interest in ensuring maximum transparency in this event,” said Charles Tobin, one of the lawyers who supported the media companies. Trump, in statements on social media, asked the court to unseal the unredacted version of the affidavit “in the interest of transparency.” But none of his lawyers have filed motions asking the federal court in West Palm Beach to do so. However, his attorney, Christina Bobb, was present in the courtroom Thursday to watch the proceedings. The former president says the investigation was politically motivated. He also said, without providing evidence, that he had a standing order to declassify the documents in question. However, none of the three laws cited by the Justice Department in the search warrant require proof that the documents were actually classified. Threats against FBI agents have increased since the raid. In Ohio last week, police shot and killed a gunman after he tried to break into an FBI building. A second man in Pennsylvania, meanwhile, has since been charged with making threats against FBI agents.
Witness safety is a concern, Justice Department says
Bratt said Thursday that the two agents named in a leaked copy of the warrant have also received threats since then. In addition, he said, the Justice Department is “very concerned about the safety of the witnesses in the case.” Trump’s rhetoric against the FBI has resonated with Republican voters, 54 percent of whom say federal law enforcement officials acted irresponsibly in the case, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll this week. The Mar-a-Lago investigation marked a major escalation in one of several federal and state probes Trump has faced since his time in office and into private businesses. The Republican former president has suggested he might run for the White House again in 2024, but has made no commitments. WATCHES | Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act:
Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act, FBI search warrant reveals
A US federal judge has unsealed the search warrant used at former US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The Justice Department released a short list of what FBI agents seized, which included 20 boxes of papers that could violate US espionage laws. Last week, US Attorney General Merrick Garland took the highly unusual step of publicly moving to unseal the search warrant, two attachments and a redacted version of the receipt showing the items the FBI seized during its Aug. 8 investigation. The records showed the FBI seized boxes containing 11 sets of classified material, some of which were classified “top secret” – the highest level of classification reserved for the most sensitive US national security information. Such documents are usually kept in special government facilities because disclosure could seriously harm national security. Earlier this week, the Justice Department said it was open to releasing some additional redacted materials from the warrant, such as the covers, the government’s motion to seal and the court’s sealing order. The media in the case requested that those records be unsealed as well. At the start of Thursday’s proceedings, Reinhart said he would unseal those other portions of the documents with some modifications.
title: “Us Judge Says He S Leaning Toward Releasing Some Evidence In Trump Probe Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-11-11” author: “Nicholas Walker”
Despite the Justice Department’s objections, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Rinehart said he believed “there are parts of the affidavit that could be unsealed,” referring to the affidavit that contained the evidence on why there was probable cause to investigate the Trump’s mar-a-. Lago Resort. Reinhart ordered the Justice Department to file a redacted version of the affidavit by noon next Thursday, but said the Justice Department would be given an opportunity to appeal if prosecutors do not agree with his proposed version. The judge’s order appeared to mark a victory for the news outlets, which appeared in federal court in West Palm Beach on Thursday to convince the judge that the public interest in the affidavit outweighed the benefits of keeping it sealed. The Department of Justice objects to the release of the evidence. Jay Bratt, head of the department’s counterintelligence and export control division, told the judge Thursday that releasing the affidavit is not in the public interest because it could harm the ongoing investigation. “There is another public interest at stake and that is the public interest in criminal investigations being able to proceed unhindered,” he said. The investigation was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed documents when he left office in January 2021 after losing the presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden. The Justice Department is investigating violations of three laws, including a provision of the Espionage Act that prohibits possession of national defense information and another law that makes it a crime to knowingly destroy, conceal or falsify records to obstruct an investigation. Law enforcement officers stand outside the Paul G. Rogers Federal Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. Despite objections from the Justice Department, a Florida judge said he believes parts of the affidavit used to obtain the warrant that allowed the FBI to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort could be unsealed. (Lynne Sladky/Associated Press)
The media is pushing for the release of records
Lawyers for several media outlets, including the New York Times, the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, ABC News and NBC News, told Reinhart on Thursday that the public’s right to know and the historical significance of the investigation outweighed arguments for keeping of the files. sealed. “The public could not have a more compelling interest in ensuring maximum transparency in this event,” said Charles Tobin, one of the lawyers who supported the media companies. Trump, in statements on social media, asked the court to unseal the unredacted version of the affidavit “in the interest of transparency.” But none of his lawyers have filed motions asking the federal court in West Palm Beach to do so. However, his attorney, Christina Bobb, was present in the courtroom Thursday to watch the proceedings. The former president says the investigation was politically motivated. He also said, without providing evidence, that he had a standing order to declassify the documents in question. However, none of the three laws cited by the Justice Department in the search warrant require proof that the documents were actually classified. Threats against FBI agents have increased since the raid. In Ohio last week, police shot and killed a gunman after he tried to break into an FBI building. A second man in Pennsylvania, meanwhile, has since been charged with making threats against FBI agents.
Witness safety is a concern, Justice Department says
Bratt said Thursday that the two agents named in a leaked copy of the warrant have also received threats since then. In addition, he said, the Justice Department is “very concerned about the safety of the witnesses in the case.” Trump’s rhetoric against the FBI has resonated with Republican voters, 54 percent of whom say federal law enforcement officials acted irresponsibly in the case, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll this week. The Mar-a-Lago investigation marked a major escalation in one of several federal and state probes Trump has faced since his time in office and into private businesses. The Republican former president has suggested he might run for the White House again in 2024, but has made no commitments. WATCHES | Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act:
Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act, FBI search warrant reveals
A US federal judge has unsealed the search warrant used at former US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The Justice Department released a short list of what FBI agents seized, which included 20 boxes of papers that could violate US espionage laws. Last week, US Attorney General Merrick Garland took the highly unusual step of publicly moving to unseal the search warrant, two attachments and a redacted version of the receipt showing the items the FBI seized during its Aug. 8 investigation. The records showed the FBI seized boxes containing 11 sets of classified material, some of which were classified “top secret” – the highest level of classification reserved for the most sensitive US national security information. Such documents are usually kept in special government facilities because disclosure could seriously harm national security. Earlier this week, the Justice Department said it was open to releasing some additional redacted materials from the warrant, such as the covers, the government’s motion to seal and the court’s sealing order. The media in the case requested that those records be unsealed as well. At the start of Thursday’s proceedings, Reinhart said he would unseal those other portions of the documents with some modifications.
title: “Us Judge Says He S Leaning Toward Releasing Some Evidence In Trump Probe Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-12-09” author: “Mark Duffy”
Despite the Justice Department’s objections, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Rinehart said he believed “there are parts of the affidavit that could be unsealed,” referring to the affidavit that contained the evidence on why there was probable cause to investigate the Trump’s mar-a-. Lago Resort. Reinhart ordered the Justice Department to file a redacted version of the affidavit by noon next Thursday, but said the Justice Department would be given an opportunity to appeal if prosecutors do not agree with his proposed version. The judge’s order appeared to mark a victory for the news outlets, which appeared in federal court in West Palm Beach on Thursday to convince the judge that the public interest in the affidavit outweighed the benefits of keeping it sealed. The Department of Justice objects to the release of the evidence. Jay Bratt, head of the department’s counterintelligence and export control division, told the judge Thursday that releasing the affidavit is not in the public interest because it could harm the ongoing investigation. “There is another public interest at stake and that is the public interest in criminal investigations being able to proceed unhindered,” he said. The investigation was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed documents when he left office in January 2021 after losing the presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden. The Justice Department is investigating violations of three laws, including a provision of the Espionage Act that prohibits possession of national defense information and another law that makes it a crime to knowingly destroy, conceal or falsify records to obstruct an investigation. Law enforcement officers stand outside the Paul G. Rogers Federal Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. Despite objections from the Justice Department, a Florida judge said he believes parts of the affidavit used to obtain the warrant that allowed the FBI to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort could be unsealed. (Lynne Sladky/Associated Press)
The media is pushing for the release of records
Lawyers for several media outlets, including the New York Times, the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, ABC News and NBC News, told Reinhart on Thursday that the public’s right to know and the historical significance of the investigation outweighed arguments for keeping of the files. sealed. “The public could not have a more compelling interest in ensuring maximum transparency in this event,” said Charles Tobin, one of the lawyers who supported the media companies. Trump, in statements on social media, asked the court to unseal the unredacted version of the affidavit “in the interest of transparency.” But none of his lawyers have filed motions asking the federal court in West Palm Beach to do so. However, his attorney, Christina Bobb, was present in the courtroom Thursday to watch the proceedings. The former president says the investigation was politically motivated. He also said, without providing evidence, that he had a standing order to declassify the documents in question. However, none of the three laws cited by the Justice Department in the search warrant require proof that the documents were actually classified. Threats against FBI agents have increased since the raid. In Ohio last week, police shot and killed a gunman after he tried to break into an FBI building. A second man in Pennsylvania, meanwhile, has since been charged with making threats against FBI agents.
Witness safety is a concern, Justice Department says
Bratt said Thursday that the two agents named in a leaked copy of the warrant have also received threats since then. In addition, he said, the Justice Department is “very concerned about the safety of the witnesses in the case.” Trump’s rhetoric against the FBI has resonated with Republican voters, 54 percent of whom say federal law enforcement officials acted irresponsibly in the case, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll this week. The Mar-a-Lago investigation marked a major escalation in one of several federal and state probes Trump has faced since his time in office and into private businesses. The Republican former president has suggested he might run for the White House again in 2024, but has made no commitments. WATCHES | Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act:
Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act, FBI search warrant reveals
A US federal judge has unsealed the search warrant used at former US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The Justice Department released a short list of what FBI agents seized, which included 20 boxes of papers that could violate US espionage laws. Last week, US Attorney General Merrick Garland took the highly unusual step of publicly moving to unseal the search warrant, two attachments and a redacted version of the receipt showing the items the FBI seized during its Aug. 8 investigation. The records showed the FBI seized boxes containing 11 sets of classified material, some of which were classified “top secret” – the highest level of classification reserved for the most sensitive US national security information. Such documents are usually kept in special government facilities because disclosure could seriously harm national security. Earlier this week, the Justice Department said it was open to releasing some additional redacted materials from the warrant, such as the covers, the government’s motion to seal and the court’s sealing order. The media in the case requested that those records be unsealed as well. At the start of Thursday’s proceedings, Reinhart said he would unseal those other portions of the documents with some modifications.
title: “Us Judge Says He S Leaning Toward Releasing Some Evidence In Trump Probe Klmat” ShowToc: true date: “2022-10-22” author: “Christine Padilla”
Despite the Justice Department’s objections, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Rinehart said he believed “there are parts of the affidavit that could be unsealed,” referring to the affidavit that contained the evidence on why there was probable cause to investigate the Trump’s mar-a-. Lago Resort. Reinhart ordered the Justice Department to file a redacted version of the affidavit by noon next Thursday, but said the Justice Department would be given an opportunity to appeal if prosecutors do not agree with his proposed version. The judge’s order appeared to mark a victory for the news outlets, which appeared in federal court in West Palm Beach on Thursday to convince the judge that the public interest in the affidavit outweighed the benefits of keeping it sealed. The Department of Justice objects to the release of the evidence. Jay Bratt, head of the department’s counterintelligence and export control division, told the judge Thursday that releasing the affidavit is not in the public interest because it could harm the ongoing investigation. “There is another public interest at stake and that is the public interest in criminal investigations being able to proceed unhindered,” he said. The investigation was part of a federal investigation into whether Trump illegally removed documents when he left office in January 2021 after losing the presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden. The Justice Department is investigating violations of three laws, including a provision of the Espionage Act that prohibits possession of national defense information and another law that makes it a crime to knowingly destroy, conceal or falsify records to obstruct an investigation. Law enforcement officers stand outside the Paul G. Rogers Federal Courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. Despite objections from the Justice Department, a Florida judge said he believes parts of the affidavit used to obtain the warrant that allowed the FBI to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort could be unsealed. (Lynne Sladky/Associated Press)
The media is pushing for the release of records
Lawyers for several media outlets, including the New York Times, the publisher of the Wall Street Journal, ABC News and NBC News, told Reinhart on Thursday that the public’s right to know and the historical significance of the investigation outweighed arguments for keeping of the files. sealed. “The public could not have a more compelling interest in ensuring maximum transparency in this event,” said Charles Tobin, one of the lawyers who supported the media companies. Trump, in statements on social media, asked the court to unseal the unredacted version of the affidavit “in the interest of transparency.” But none of his lawyers have filed motions asking the federal court in West Palm Beach to do so. However, his attorney, Christina Bobb, was present in the courtroom Thursday to watch the proceedings. The former president says the investigation was politically motivated. He also said, without providing evidence, that he had a standing order to declassify the documents in question. However, none of the three laws cited by the Justice Department in the search warrant require proof that the documents were actually classified. Threats against FBI agents have increased since the raid. In Ohio last week, police shot and killed a gunman after he tried to break into an FBI building. A second man in Pennsylvania, meanwhile, has since been charged with making threats against FBI agents.
Witness safety is a concern, Justice Department says
Bratt said Thursday that the two agents named in a leaked copy of the warrant have also received threats since then. In addition, he said, the Justice Department is “very concerned about the safety of the witnesses in the case.” Trump’s rhetoric against the FBI has resonated with Republican voters, 54 percent of whom say federal law enforcement officials acted irresponsibly in the case, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll this week. The Mar-a-Lago investigation marked a major escalation in one of several federal and state probes Trump has faced since his time in office and into private businesses. The Republican former president has suggested he might run for the White House again in 2024, but has made no commitments. WATCHES | Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act:
Trump is under investigation for violations of the Espionage Act, FBI search warrant reveals
A US federal judge has unsealed the search warrant used at former US President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. The Justice Department released a short list of what FBI agents seized, which included 20 boxes of papers that could violate US espionage laws. Last week, US Attorney General Merrick Garland took the highly unusual step of publicly moving to unseal the search warrant, two attachments and a redacted version of the receipt showing the items the FBI seized during its Aug. 8 investigation. The records showed the FBI seized boxes containing 11 sets of classified material, some of which were classified “top secret” – the highest level of classification reserved for the most sensitive US national security information. Such documents are usually kept in special government facilities because disclosure could seriously harm national security. Earlier this week, the Justice Department said it was open to releasing some additional redacted materials from the warrant, such as the covers, the government’s motion to seal and the court’s sealing order. The media in the case requested that those records be unsealed as well. At the start of Thursday’s proceedings, Reinhart said he would unseal those other portions of the documents with some modifications.
